Logging in on a deployment with enabledp: true ends on the login page. The
login itself succeeds - sys_login_log records it - and then /api/v1/getinfo
answers 401 "登录失败", which sends the browser straight back.
The query behind it reads:
SELECT * FROM sys_user WHERE sys_user.user_id = 1 AND 1 = 0 AND deleted_at = 0
The 1 = 0 comes from the data-permission scope. GetInfo asked for a permission
with GetPermissionFromContext, but the group this route sits in installs only
the JWT middleware - no PermissionAction - so nothing ever put one in the
context and what came back was the zero value. An unset scope is not one of the
five recognised ones, and since unknown scopes began failing closed rather than
silently matching every row, that zero value now means "match nothing".
The route was working by accident before, and only on deployments that enable
data permissions: the repository default is enabledp: false, where Permission
returns the query untouched. That is why the local suite and CI are both green
and the demo site is not.
Two different faults, so two different fixes:
/getinfo reads the caller's own row - the id comes from the token. A data
scope answers "whose rows may this user see", so there is nothing left for it
to restrict, and applying one is not a stricter version of the query but a
broken one: DataScopeSelf matches on create_by, and an account is created by
whoever added it, so a scoped self-read would 401 every user who did not create
their own account. It now goes through GetSelf, which does no scoping at all -
which is how GetProfile has always read the same row.
/sys-api is the opposite case. Its three handlers do read the permission, and
they are listing and updating other people's rows, so the middleware belongs
there and was simply missing. Added.
Those four endpoints were found by checking every handler that reads the
permission against the group it is registered on. The check reports four before
this commit and none after.
No test. Both paths need a *gorm.DB with sys_user and sys_role rows before they
reach the line that matters, and this repository's CI has no database - `make
build` is CGO_ENABLED=0 with no sqlite tag. What can be tested is the shape of
the mistake rather than its effect, and that belongs in tools/checksilent as a
rule of its own; it is not in this commit because a site that cannot be logged
into should not wait for it.
The comment called Visible "0" "hidden by default" and then said an
administrator should not have to unhide the menu - which cannot both be
true. "0" is shown; every menu this repository seeds, including the demo
product menu that is visible on the demo site, uses it.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HPTAw8b8tAdFNFn8rKdPYx
grantToAdminRole does two independent things - it grants the menus to the
admin role and writes a casbin rule per api - and SeedMenus skipped the
whole call whenever the menu list came back empty.
An application is free to register apis with no menus: endpoints another
service calls, a webhook, a UI mounted somewhere else. Those installs wrote
their sys_api rows and then no casbin rule for any of them, so every one of
those endpoints was denied to everyone, admin included - from a migration
that reported success and left rows in the table to prove it had run. There
is nothing to look at afterwards that says what went wrong.
Guard on both lists instead, so nothing registered stays a no-op and apis
alone still get granted.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HPTAw8b8tAdFNFn8rKdPYx
core's seed package defines what an application may ask for and leaves the
writing to the host, which is the only side that knows its own tables. No
host implemented it, so SeedMenus returned ErrNoSeeder and an application's
menus never appeared.
adminSeeder writes all four kinds of row, not the two an obvious reading
would stop at: without sys_menu_api_rule and the sys_role_menu / casbin_rule
grants, the menu exists and no role can reach it.
Ids are always autoincrement, never caller-assigned - checksilent's
menu-id-collision check reads literals in this repository's tree and cannot
see an application in the module cache, so the collision is removed by
construction instead of guarded. The runtime validation covers what a static
scan cannot reach for a third-party spec: duplicate codes, unresolved parents
and api references, an unknown kind, and a sort outside sys_menu.sort's
tinyint range.
MenuSpec carries no menu name, so one is synthesised from the app code and
the spec code - two applications both choosing "list" would otherwise collide
on the frontend's keep-alive key.
It lives in app/admin/service because cmd links both subcommands into one
binary, so its init runs whichever one is invoked, and cmd/migrate never has
to import app/admin to reach it.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HPTAw8b8tAdFNFn8rKdPYx
sys_migration already carries app_code; sys_menu and sys_api did not, so
nothing said which application seeded a row - which is what an uninstall or
an audit would have to ask.
The migration adds the columns through the runtime models rather than
cmd/migrate/migration/models, whose frozen ModelTime is wrong for anything
ordered after the soft-delete conversion.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HPTAw8b8tAdFNFn8rKdPYx
Four modules each called AuthInit and built their own instance, so which
one Runtime handed back was decided by whichever module initialised last.
The JwtToken key was also registered as an unbound method expression,
which GetHandlerFunc's type assertion can never match - the key was
registered and unusable at the same time.
The instance is now built once here and registered as a bound closure.
Modules read it back through GetAuthMiddleware, which is fatal rather
than nil when called before InitMiddleware has run: a process without a
JWT middleware should not reach the point of serving a request.
Only one call site needs the instance itself rather than the handler
(admin's /login, for LoginHandler); the thirty-odd MiddlewareFunc() call
sites are unchanged.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HPTAw8b8tAdFNFn8rKdPYx
The privilege-escalation tests skipped themselves when opening the in-memory
database or running AutoMigrate failed. Both depend on nothing outside the
process, so a failure there means the environment is genuinely broken - and a
security regression that quietly does not run is worse than one that is
missing, because CI stays green either way.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HPTAw8b8tAdFNFn8rKdPYx
app/admin/models/datascope.go carried a second copy of the scope logic with no
callers. Its department-tree pattern was written as "%" + id + "%" instead of
"%/" + id + "/%", so dept_id 1 also matched /11/, /21/ and /100/ - visibility
into unrelated subtrees.
It sat where someone looking for a data permission example would find it. The
copy that is actually wired up stays in common/actions.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HPTAw8b8tAdFNFn8rKdPYx
Nothing checked what went into sys_role.data_scope, so creating a role without
a dataScope stored an empty string - the value that used to be indistinguishable
from "see everything".
All three DTOs that write the column are validated, not just the insert path:
they target the same column, and guarding one entrance while leaving two open
would not be a guard.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HPTAw8b8tAdFNFn8rKdPYx
Two directions, because the fix has to hold both: an attacker with no policy on
this route cannot raise another user's role, and a self-edit cannot raise its
own. The second one is what keeps the fix from being "just remove the route
from CasbinExclude", which would break the profile page.
The tests drive the handler directly rather than through the router, because
the middleware is exactly what does not run for this route - the defence lives
in the handler, so that is where it has to be proven.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HPTAw8b8tAdFNFn8rKdPYx
The profile page posts the whole user object back, including roleId, deptId and
status, because it renders from a full SysUser it fetched earlier. A caller
editing their own record can therefore hand back a tampered roleId.
Self-edits now reload those three fields from the database and ignore whatever
the request carried. For an honest client this is a no-op - the values it sends
are already its own - so the profile page keeps working unchanged.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HPTAw8b8tAdFNFn8rKdPYx
PUT /api/v1/sys-user sits in CasbinExclude so the profile page can reach it,
which means AuthCheckRole never runs for this route. The handler took the
target user id from the request body, so any authenticated caller could edit
another user's record - including their roleId.
The route has to stay excluded: the profile page and the admin user list share
this one endpoint, so removing the exclusion would break self-service editing
for every non-admin role. The check therefore moves into the handler: when the
target is not the caller, the request is put through Casbin explicitly.
EnforceRoleFor carries the same admin short-circuit and enforcement AuthCheckRole
uses, so a route that opts out of the middleware can still ask the same question.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HPTAw8b8tAdFNFn8rKdPYx
common/middleware imported app/admin/service/dto for two string constants,
which made a package apps are told to build on depend on one particular app.
The previous commit added a data-permission scope to SysApi.Update and
returned early on db.Error, which left the RowsAffected check below it
unreachable: First reports a row the scope excluded as ErrRecordNotFound,
so the caller got "record not found" where the code meant to say
"无权更新该数据".
Map that one error to the permission message and drop the check it made
dead. The two cases - the row does not exist, and the row exists but is
not yours - have to look the same from outside, and now do.
Found by Copilot's review of #889.
SysApi.Update took a DataPermission and never used it, so with data
permission enabled the update reached rows the caller could not read
through GetPage, Get or Remove, which all scope the query. It also
reported "无权更新该数据" for a row that simply did not exist, a message
that only becomes true once the scope is applied.
Drops the Debug() left on the query, which logged the statement for
every call.
BeforeCreate and BeforeUpdate run Encrypt on whatever is in the struct,
and a user read from the database carries the stored hash in Password.
Hashing it again produces a hash of a hash: the password that user knows
stops matching, they cannot log in, and nothing reports an error.
Only the Omit("password") on SysUser.Update stood between that and the
stored credential. Any other write to this model - a profile update
written the way every other model here is written - destroys the
password, permanently and silently.
Encrypt now returns early when Password already parses as a bcrypt hash.
That also removes the round SysUser.Update was paying and discarding:
306ns where it was 54.7ms, on a route reachable without the permission
check, since PUT /api/v1/sys-user is in CasbinExclude.
The cost of deciding from the value is that a password which is itself a
well-formed bcrypt hash would be stored unchanged. That is a
60-character string beginning "$2a$", and it grants whoever set it no
access they did not already have.
The answer was written at info level on every captcha request, so a currently
valid answer sat in the application log. Anyone able to read the log - an
operator, a log aggregator, anything that ships logs off the host - could
bypass the check the captcha exists to enforce.
The default log level records it, so this was not limited to debug builds.
Every import of the module changes, not only the seven packages that
moved out of sdk/pkg: Go requires the major version in the path from v2
on. Both happen in one pass —
go run github.com/go-admin-team/go-admin-core/tools/coreupgrade@v2.0.0 -w -v2 .
go mod tidy
— which is the command the release notes give, run here as a consumer
would run it. 210 imports across 95 files.
The compatibility shims this used are gone in v2, so the paths that
moved had to move: sdk/pkg/captcha, sdk/pkg/jwtauth and its user
package, sdk/pkg/response and sdk/pkg/casbin.
The count of unformatted files is unchanged at 34, none of them touched
by this: the tool reformats a file only if it was already gofmt clean,
so a migration cannot disappear into whitespace.
Review caught that this reissued getByRoleName's query instead of
calling it, so it passed whether or not the production line still said
what it was supposed to — a test named for a change it did not touch.
It calls getByRoleName now, and restoring the hand-written clause fails
it for exactly the reason this PR exists: with the marker non-null,
"deleted_at is null" matches nothing and the query returns an empty
list.
Two things in front of the unique-index work, both safe on their own.
getSysMenuByRoleName carried "deleted_at is null" in its where clause.
GORM adds that condition itself for a model with a DeletedAt field, so
it was a duplicate — and one phrased as a column being null, which stops
being true the moment the column stops being nullable. A schema that
moves to a non-null delete marker would have turned this query into one
that matches nothing, silently, for admin users only.
SysDictType.Insert dropped the error from its duplicate check: a query
that failed left the count at zero and the insert went ahead as though
the name were free.
The test pins what the removed clause was there for. Its counter-proof
is Unscoped rather than deleting the field — taking ModelTime off the
model fails to compile, which proves nothing.
The pinned core dated from April, before sdk stopped being a separate module,
so the build resolved sdk packages from the old module and core packages from
the new one. Dropping the separate requirement is what makes the two agree
again.
Most of the diff is renames that came with that: the tenant accessors gained a
ByTenant suffix, GetDb now returns one database and GetAllDb the map, and
casbin moved to v3.
The change that matters is four call sites moving from GetMemoryQueue to
GetQueuePrefix. GetMemoryQueue returns a queue fixed at construction, so the
login log, the operate log and the api check ran in process no matter what the
settings file selected — a second instance saw none of it. GetQueuePrefix
returns whatever the configuration built, which is the point of being able to
configure a queue at all.
Verified against core at main: build and vet clean. The two file_store failures
are unchanged from before this branch; they need cloud credentials.
zhangwenjian